๐๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐œ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐ข๐ง ๐Š๐ž๐ซ๐š๐ฅ๐š: ๐€ ๐‚๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐œ๐š๐ฅ ๐‘๐ž๐Ÿ๐ฅ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ง ๐ˆ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐‘๐ข๐ฌ๐ž ๐€๐ฆ๐ข๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ซ๐ž๐ญ๐ก๐ซ๐ž๐ง ๐…๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐Œ๐š๐ซ ๐“๐ก๐จ๐ฆ๐š ๐‘๐ž๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ

๐๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐œ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐ข๐ง ๐Š๐ž๐ซ๐š๐ฅ๐š: ๐€ ๐‚๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐œ๐š๐ฅ ๐‘๐ž๐Ÿ๐ฅ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ง ๐ˆ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐‘๐ข๐ฌ๐ž ๐€๐ฆ๐ข๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ซ๐ž๐ญ๐ก๐ซ๐ž๐ง ๐…๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐Œ๐š๐ซ ๐“๐ก๐จ๐ฆ๐š ๐‘๐ž๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ

๐‘ฐ๐’๐’•๐’“๐’๐’…๐’–๐’„๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’

The early 20th century witnessed a remarkable spiritual transformation in Kerala, India — a region already marked by rich Christian traditions such as the reform-driven Mar Thoma Church and the Bible-centered Brethren movement. Yet beneath this established religious fabric lay a deep spiritual hunger — a yearning not merely for doctrinal purity but for divine encounter, experiential faith, and Spirit-empowered living.

It was in this fertile yet spiritually restless context that the Pentecostal movement took root and flourished. Far from being a foreign import or theological aberration, Pentecostalism emerged as both a response to and a critique of the prevailing ecclesiastical forms. With its passionate emphasis on the baptism of the Holy Spirit, spontaneous worship, healing, and missions, it introduced a dynamic spirituality that resonated with the people’s desire for renewal and direct access to God’s power.

This article explores the historical, theological, and cultural contours that shaped the rise of Pentecostalism in Kerala. It critically examines the spiritual void left by earlier movements, the reasons for the popular reception of Pentecostal teachings, and the movement’s missional zeal. While acknowledging its flaws and excesses, the discussion aims to offer a balanced perspective on how this Spirit-led awakening not only reshaped Kerala’s Christian identity but also left an indelible mark on the Indian church at large.

In tracing this journey “from roots to revival,” we gain insight into the forces that can renew faith communities and the challenges that come with spiritual innovation.

1.                    ๐‘ป๐’‰๐’† ๐‘ฏ๐’Š๐’”๐’•๐’๐’“๐’Š๐’„๐’‚๐’ ๐‘ช๐’๐’๐’•๐’†๐’™๐’• ๐’๐’‡ ๐‘ฌ๐’‚๐’“๐’๐’š 20๐’•๐’‰-๐‘ช๐’†๐’๐’•๐’–๐’“๐’š ๐‘ฒ๐’†๐’“๐’‚๐’๐’‚ ๐‘ช๐’‰๐’“๐’Š๐’”๐’•๐’Š๐’‚๐’๐’Š๐’•๐’š

The early 20th century in Kerala was a period of intense socio-religious transformation, marked by both revivalist fervor and reformist movements within the Christian community. Kerala, often referred to as the cradle of Indian Christianity, already had a deep-rooted Christian presence, tracing its origins to the apostolic witness of St. Thomas in the first century. However, by the 1800s and into the early 1900s, this ancient faith found itself at a crossroads of tradition, colonial influence, and indigenous renewal.

1.1     ๐‘ช๐’๐’๐’๐’๐’Š๐’‚๐’ ๐‘ด๐’Š๐’”๐’”๐’Š๐’๐’๐’” ๐’‚๐’๐’… ๐‘ฌ๐’„๐’„๐’๐’†๐’”๐’Š๐’‚๐’”๐’•๐’Š๐’„๐’‚๐’ ๐‘ป๐’†๐’๐’”๐’Š๐’๐’๐’”

The presence of European missionary societies, especially the Church Mission Society (CMS) and London Missionary Society (LMS), brought with them Western theological frameworks and educational initiatives. These missions, particularly among the Syrian Christian communities, triggered both inspiration and conflict. Many native leaders welcomed reformist ideas rooted in biblical literacy and personal faith, while others resisted what they perceived as cultural colonization.

This tension birthed the Mar Thoma Reformation in the late 19th century, led by figures like Abraham Malpan, who sought to purify and return the Church to biblical foundations, while still retaining the liturgical and sacramental heritage of the East Syrian tradition. The result was a semi-reformed church with both Protestant and Oriental elements—the Mar Thoma Syrian Church.

1.2. ๐‘ป๐’‰๐’† ๐‘น๐’Š๐’”๐’† ๐’๐’‡ ๐‘ฌ๐’—๐’‚๐’๐’ˆ๐’†๐’๐’Š๐’„๐’‚๐’ ๐‘ฉ๐’Š๐’ƒ๐’๐’† ๐‘ด๐’๐’—๐’†๐’Ž๐’†๐’๐’•๐’”

Parallel to this reformation was the emergence of evangelical Bible study fellowships influenced by the Plymouth Brethren movement. British missionaries and returning educated Indians introduced non-liturgical, congregational church models focused on expository preaching, dispensationalist theology, and biblical literalism. These Brethren assemblies grew quietly but powerfully, especially among the youth and educated classes, encouraging lay leadership, independent local churches, and strict adherence to Scripture.

1.3. ๐‘บ๐’๐’„๐’Š๐’‚๐’ ๐‘จ๐’˜๐’‚๐’Œ๐’†๐’๐’Š๐’๐’ˆ ๐’‚๐’๐’… ๐‘ช๐’‚๐’”๐’•๐’† ๐‘ฌ๐’’๐’–๐’‚๐’๐’Š๐’•๐’š

The early 1900s also witnessed a wider social awakening in Kerala, spearheaded by reformers like Sree Narayana Guru and Ayyankali, challenging caste oppression and social injustice. These movements inevitably influenced the Christian communities, pushing churches to reconsider their elitist structures, access to sacraments, and educational institutions.

1.4. ๐‘บ๐’‘๐’Š๐’“๐’Š๐’•๐’–๐’‚๐’ ๐‘ฏ๐’–๐’๐’ˆ๐’†๐’“ ๐’‚๐’๐’… ๐’•๐’‰๐’† ๐‘ฉ๐’Š๐’“๐’•๐’‰ ๐’๐’‡ ๐‘ท๐’†๐’๐’•๐’†๐’„๐’๐’”๐’•๐’‚๐’๐’Š๐’”๐’Ž

Within this ferment of Bible-centered reformation, liturgical tradition, and social change, arose a new longing for spiritual experience, empowerment, and revival. Influenced by global Pentecostal movements like Azusa Street (1906) and visiting missionaries from the Assemblies of God and Church of God, a fresh wave of Spirit-filled Christianity began to take shape in Kerala.

What made Pentecostalism unique in this context was its emphasis on the baptism of the Holy Spirit, miracles, healing, and prophetic expressions, which appealed especially to the marginalized, the spiritually hungry, and those left unsatisfied by the intellectualism of Brethren or the institutionalism of reformed churches.

Thus, the early 20th century was a turning point in Kerala’s Christian history, where liturgical tradition, Protestant reform, evangelical revival, and charismatic renewal all converged. This period laid the foundation for diverse expressions of Christian faith in the state—setting the stage for the rapid growth of Pentecostalism in the decades to follow.

2.                   ๐‘ป๐’‰๐’†๐’๐’๐’๐’ˆ๐’Š๐’„๐’‚๐’ ๐‘ฌ๐’Ž๐’‘๐’‰๐’‚๐’”๐’†๐’” ๐’‚๐’๐’… ๐‘พ๐’†๐’‚๐’Œ๐’๐’†๐’”๐’”๐’†๐’” ๐’๐’‡ ๐’•๐’‰๐’† ๐‘ฉ๐’“๐’†๐’•๐’‰๐’“๐’†๐’ ๐’‚๐’๐’… ๐‘ด๐’‚๐’“ ๐‘ป๐’‰๐’๐’Ž๐’‚ ๐‘ป๐’“๐’‚๐’…๐’Š๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’๐’”

In the religiously vibrant milieu of early 20th-century Kerala, both the Brethren Movement and the Mar Thoma Church stood out as reformational forces that sought to return to biblical foundations in the face of both stagnant traditionalism and Western ecclesiastical dominance. While they shared a passion for biblical truth and reform, their theological emphases and limitations were markedly distinct.

2.1    ๐‘ป๐’‰๐’† ๐‘ฉ๐’“๐’†๐’•๐’‰๐’“๐’†๐’ ๐‘ป๐’“๐’‚๐’…๐’Š๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’: ๐‘ฉ๐’Š๐’ƒ๐’๐’Š๐’„๐’‚๐’ ๐‘บ๐’Š๐’Ž๐’‘๐’๐’Š๐’„๐’Š๐’•๐’š ๐’‚๐’๐’… ๐‘บ๐’†๐’‘๐’‚๐’“๐’‚๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’

The Brethren movement in Kerala, greatly influenced by British Open Brethren missionaries, was characterized by a strong emphasis on biblical literalism, congregational autonomy, and lay leadership. They championed the sola scriptura principle, placing the Bible as the sole authority in matters of faith and practice. Worship was deliberately simple, avoiding liturgy, clericalism, or ornate traditions. The movement rejected hierarchical leadership, promoting the idea of the priesthood of all believers, and discouraged titles like “pastor” or “reverend.”

Strengths included:

  • Strong commitment to Bible study and personal discipleship
  • A focus on evangelism, often in rural and unreached areas
  • Financial independence, refusing foreign support to avoid external control

However, this movement also had notable weaknesses:

  • A tendency toward doctrinal rigidity and suspicion of emotional expressions of faith
  • Minimal ecclesiology that sometimes led to fragmentation and lack of unified vision
  • An inward-looking posture that sometimes failed to engage social or cultural issues holistically

2.2   ๐‘ป๐’‰๐’† ๐‘ด๐’‚๐’“ ๐‘ป๐’‰๐’๐’Ž๐’‚ ๐‘ช๐’‰๐’–๐’“๐’„๐’‰: ๐‘น๐’†๐’‡๐’๐’“๐’Ž๐’‚๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’ ๐’˜๐’Š๐’•๐’‰๐’Š๐’ ๐‘ป๐’“๐’‚๐’…๐’Š๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’

The Mar Thoma Syrian Church emerged from within the Syrian Christian tradition but underwent reform under the influence of Anglican missionaries and the 19th-century CMS (Church Missionary Society). It retained many Eastern liturgical forms but reinterpreted them through Reformation theology, embracing justification by faith, personal salvation, and Bible-centered preaching.

Strengths of the Mar Thoma tradition included:

  • A robust liturgical heritage married with evangelical theology
  • A proactive approach to education, social reform, and ecumenical engagement
  • A more holistic vision of the Christian life, addressing both spiritual and societal needs

Yet, there were also shortcomings:

  • The continued presence of hierarchical clerical structures and a centralized authority limited lay participation
  • Reformation ideas were sometimes nominally held and not consistently practiced at the grassroots
  • Over-identification with cultural respectability sometimes muted bold gospel proclamation

Together, these two streams laid important theological and spiritual groundwork in Kerala—one with a strict biblicist orientation and grassroots fervor (Brethren), the other with a liturgical richness and reformational consciousness (Mar Thoma). However, both also left gaps—in terms of emotional experience, spiritual dynamism, and charismatic openness—that later Pentecostal movements would seek to fill.

2.3   ๐‘ป๐’‰๐’† ๐‘บ๐’๐’„๐’Š๐’-๐‘บ๐’‘๐’Š๐’“๐’Š๐’•๐’–๐’‚๐’ ๐‘ฏ๐’–๐’๐’ˆ๐’†๐’“ ๐‘ป๐’‰๐’‚๐’• ๐‘ฎ๐’‚๐’—๐’† ๐‘น๐’Š๐’”๐’† ๐’•๐’ ๐‘ท๐’†๐’๐’•๐’†๐’„๐’๐’”๐’•๐’‚๐’ ๐‘ฌ๐’™๐’‘๐’“๐’†๐’”๐’”๐’Š๐’๐’๐’”

In the early 20th century, Kerala stood at a unique crossroad of religious ferment, social reform, and spiritual longing. While historic Christian denominations like the Mar Thoma Church and the Brethren movement brought scriptural revival and doctrinal clarity, they also left certain deep spiritual yearnings unmet—particularly among the common people and marginalized communities.

The Mar Thoma Church, born out of the Syrian Christian reformation, emphasized liturgical order and biblical preaching, distancing itself from Roman Catholic rituals while retaining episcopal structures. Similarly, the Brethren movement championed sola scriptura, a non-clerical ecclesiology, and a strong commitment to biblical exegesis and holy living. However, both movements, despite their strengths, tended to be more intellectual and rational in tone. Their gatherings, while sincere, often lacked the dynamic, experiential spirituality that many people craved.

It was in this context of doctrinal depth but emotional dryness, of truth-rich pulpits but spirit-thirsty hearts, that Pentecostalism found fertile soil. Socio-economically, many lower-caste converts and socially ostracized individuals found little space or belonging in the structured and, at times, exclusivist settings of existing churches. Spiritually, there was a hunger for the felt presence of God, for healing, for signs of divine power, and for an unmediated encounter with the Holy Spirit.

The Pentecostal movement—with its emphasis on Spirit baptism, healing, tongues, and vibrant worship—offered a tangible experience of the divine. It democratized access to spiritual power, giving voice and agency to the marginalized and uneducated, even as it bypassed established hierarchies and rigid systems.

Thus, Pentecostalism did not emerge in a vacuum. It was, in many ways, a response to a dual hunger—a hunger for the living presence of God and a longing for spiritual equality in worship and ministry. It thrived where other traditions had tilled the ground but failed to water it with experiential vitality.

Today, the ongoing challenge for the Pentecostal movement is to preserve this spiritual fervor while also embracing theological depth and historical rootedness—something its forerunners had in abundance.

3.                   ๐‘ป๐’‰๐’† ๐‘ด๐’Š๐’”๐’”๐’Š๐’๐’๐’‚๐’ ๐’๐’†๐’‚๐’ ๐’‚๐’๐’… ๐‘ฌ๐’Ž๐’๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’๐’‚๐’ ๐‘จ๐’‘๐’‘๐’†๐’‚๐’ ๐‘ป๐’‰๐’‚๐’• ๐‘ช๐’๐’๐’•๐’“๐’Š๐’ƒ๐’–๐’•๐’†๐’… ๐’•๐’ ๐‘ท๐’†๐’๐’•๐’†๐’„๐’๐’”๐’•๐’‚๐’ ๐‘ฎ๐’“๐’๐’˜๐’•๐’‰

The phenomenal growth of the Pentecostal movement in Kerala and across India during the 20th century cannot be understood apart from its distinctive missional zeal and deep emotional appeal. From its earliest days, Pentecostalism was not merely a renewal of doctrine—it was a revival of passion. This passion was both outward-focused, in its evangelistic fervor, and inward-focused, in its intense emotional spirituality.

At the heart of Pentecostal growth was its missional DNA. Pentecostal believers were convinced that they were living in the last days and that the outpouring of the Holy Spirit was a divine signal to take the gospel to every creature. This eschatological urgency translated into tireless evangelism—village after village, house after house, with no financial backing or institutional support. Evangelists walked barefoot, preached under trees, faced ridicule and persecution, and often lived in poverty—but they burned with a vision to see souls saved and lives transformed.

This missionary zeal was not confined to a select few; it was contagious. Ordinary believers, including women and youth, became passionate witnesses. The boundaries between clergy and laity blurred. Everyone was called. Everyone was sent.

Alongside this outward drive, Pentecostalism offered a powerful emotional and spiritual experience that many found lacking in the more formalized traditions. In Pentecostal gatherings, worship was uninhibited—filled with singing, clapping, weeping, dancing, and speaking in tongues. People encountered God not just intellectually but viscerally. The altar became a place of tears and breakthroughs. The Spirit was not a distant doctrine but an indwelling presence.

For many, especially those broken by life’s burdens, social rejection, or spiritual dryness, Pentecostal churches were places of healing, belonging, and transformation. Testimonies of divine deliverance—be it from sickness, addiction, or demonic oppression—strengthened faith and drew more seekers.

Thus, Pentecostal growth was driven by a dynamic combination of mission and emotion. The movement captured both the head and the heart, the feet that went and the tears that fell. It brought the gospel to the unreached and brought God near to the desperate. In this fusion of zeal and experience, Pentecostalism became not just a denomination, but a grassroots spiritual awakening.

4.                  ๐‘ฌ๐’—๐’‚๐’๐’–๐’‚๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’ˆ ๐’•๐’‰๐’† ๐‘ณ๐’†๐’ˆ๐’‚๐’„๐’š ๐’‚๐’๐’… ๐‘ช๐’๐’๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’–๐’Š๐’๐’ˆ ๐‘ฐ๐’Ž๐’‘๐’‚๐’„๐’• ๐’๐’‡ ๐‘ท๐’†๐’๐’•๐’†๐’„๐’๐’”๐’•๐’‚๐’๐’Š๐’”๐’Ž ๐’Š๐’ ๐‘ฒ๐’†๐’“๐’‚๐’๐’‚: ๐‘จ ๐‘ช๐’“๐’Š๐’•๐’Š๐’„๐’‚๐’ ๐’€๐’†๐’• ๐‘น๐’†๐’”๐’‘๐’†๐’„๐’•๐’‡๐’–๐’ ๐‘น๐’†๐’‡๐’๐’†๐’„๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’

Pentecostalism in Kerala has left a profound and enduring mark—not only on the Christian community but on the broader religious and socio-cultural landscape of the state. Its legacy is both inspiring and complex, calling for an evaluation that honors its contributions while also recognizing its growing challenges.

From its humble beginnings in the early 20th century, Pentecostalism breathed fresh life into Kerala’s Christian faith, emphasizing a personal relationship with God, vibrant worship, and a deep dependence on the Holy Spirit. It reawakened spiritual hunger in thousands and inspired bold missionary movements, often reaching communities untouched by mainstream churches. Pentecostals planted churches in remote villages, established Bible schools, and sent missionaries beyond state and national borders, shaping not only a movement, but a mindset of obedience and sacrifice.

Pentecostalism also democratized spiritual leadership. Unlike older ecclesial traditions that emphasized hierarchical authority, the Pentecostal movement empowered lay leaders, women, and youth to engage actively in ministry. This openness gave rise to dynamic house churches and grassroots fellowships, where the lines between preacher and participant blurred in a shared experience of Spirit-led worship and testimony.

At the same time, a critical evaluation reveals internal tensions and external challenges that continue to shape the movement. Over time, fragmentation became a significant issue—marked by the proliferation of small, independent churches often born out of personal conflicts rather than theological clarity. Without consistent theological training or pastoral accountability, some leaders drifted into exaggerated emotionalism or prosperity-centered messages, leading to unhealthy spiritual practices and disillusionment among sincere believers.

Additionally, Pentecostalism’s initial radical simplicity and counter-cultural witness have in some cases given way to institutionalization, materialism, and denominational competition. The prophetic voice that once called people to holiness and mission risks being muffled by the noise of organizational survival and public image.

Yet, the movement continues to be a vital force in Kerala’s Christian life. Pentecostal churches remain hubs of prayer, revival, and missionary sending. Their emphasis on spiritual gifts, heartfelt worship, and the immediacy of God still attracts the weary and the wandering. Many Pentecostal believers are now pursuing academic theology, social engagement, and interdenominational dialogue, seeking to balance passion with maturity, spontaneity with structure.

In summary, Pentecostalism in Kerala stands as a movement of both power and paradox—bearing a rich legacy of faith, sacrifice, and mission, while also needing reformation in leadership, unity, and theological depth. A respectful critique honors its pioneers, celebrates its fruits, and invites a new generation to carry the flame with integrity, humility, and renewed vision.

๐‘ช๐’๐’๐’„๐’๐’–๐’”๐’Š๐’๐’:

The rise of Pentecostalism in Kerala was not a random spiritual eruption but a response to deep undercurrents of social, theological, and emotional longing in the early 20th century. Rooted in the fertile soil prepared by the Scripture-saturated Brethren assemblies and the reform-driven Mar Thoma Church, the Pentecostal movement brought a fresh experience of the Holy Spirit, dynamic worship, and missionary fervor that captivated multitudes.

While Pentecostalism met the hunger for personal experience and revival, it often carried within it a tendency toward anti-intellectualism, emotionalism, and sectarianism. Yet, despite its flaws, its contribution to the evangelization of Kerala and beyond is significant. It challenged stagnant religiosity, empowered lay leadership, and birthed indigenous missions that spread the gospel to unreached places.

Today, as Kerala’s Christian landscape continues to evolve, a healthy reflection on Pentecostalism’s legacy calls for balance—a return to solid doctrinal foundations, openness to the Spirit’s work, and unity among diverse traditions. True spiritual renewal will not come from rivalry or isolation but from honoring our shared history, learning from one another, and returning to the apostolic vision of a Church rooted in truth, love, and mission.

๐‘ญ๐’๐’“ ๐‘ญ๐’–๐’“๐’•๐’‰๐’†๐’“ ๐’“๐’†๐’‚๐’…๐’Š๐’๐’ˆ๐’” :

  1. Anderson, Allan.
    An Introduction to Pentecostalism: Global Charismatic Christianity.
    Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  2. Bergunder, Michael.
    The South Indian Pentecostal Movement in the Twentieth Century.
    Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2008.
  3. Hedlund, Roger E.
    The Mission of the Church in the World: A Biblical Theology.
    ISPCK, 1991.
  4. George, K. M.
    Church and Society in Kerala: Historical Studies.
    K.M. George, 1972.
  5. Thomas, M. M.
    The Acknowledged Christ of the Indian Renaissance.
    SCM Press, 1969.
  6. Cherian, T. C.
    Pentecostal Movement in Kerala: A Study on the Origin and Growth of Pentecostalism in Kerala.
  7. Muthunayagom, M.
    A History of the Indian Church in the Twentieth Century.
    The Christian Literature Society, 1997.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

๐’๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง ๐›๐ž ๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฐ๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐“๐ž๐š๐œ๐ก ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‚๐ก๐ฎ๐ซ๐œ๐ก? ๐–๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ž๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐๐ข๐›๐ฅ๐ž ๐ฌ๐š๐ฒ?

๐‚๐š๐ง ๐š ๐‚๐ก๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐š๐ง ๐ƒ๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ค ๐€๐ฅ๐œ๐จ๐ก๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐œ ๐–๐ข๐ง๐ž? ๐€ ๐๐ข๐›๐ฅ๐ข๐œ๐š๐ฅ ๐๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž

๐†๐จ๐ฅ๐, ๐†๐ซ๐š๐œ๐ž, ๐š๐ง๐ ๐†๐จ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ž๐ฅ: ๐‡๐จ๐ฐ ๐Š๐ž๐ซ๐š๐ฅ๐š'๐ฌ ๐‚๐ก๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐š๐ง๐ฌ ๐Œ๐จ๐ฏ๐ž๐ ๐Ÿ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐‚๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐š๐ฅ ๐’๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ž๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ญ๐จ ๐’๐ข๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ข๐œ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ