๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐๐๐ซ๐ง ๐๐๐ซ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ
What is God’s plan for marriage?
Contemporary
culture is considerably confused regarding the nature of marriage. Only by
returning to the biblical foundation for marriage and the family will we be
able to rediscover God’s good and perfect plan for humanity in this
all-important area of our lives.
Rooted in
Creation (Genesis 1–3)
The book of
Genesis, tells the story of how families, couples as well as children,
established their relationship with each other and with God. In exploring the
biblical teaching on marriage, there is no more important paradigm than God’s
intended pattern for marriage presented in Genesis 1–3. Marriage is shown to be
rooted in God’s creative act of making humanity in his image as male and
female. The depiction of the original creation of man and woman and the
subsequent fall of humanity in Genesis 1–3 centers on at least three vital
clusters of principles:
1. The man and the woman are created in
God’s image to rule the earth for God; In this sense, then, human beings are
“like God.” Just as God rules over a large domain—the whole universe—so,
humanity is given charge of the entire earth to rule it for God. This also
establishes the principle of stewardship: God, not the man and the woman, is
ultimately the owner of the created realm; the man and the woman are simply the
divinely appointed caretakers.
This
stewardship is a joint stewardship shared by the man and the woman. Together
they are to exercise it according to the will and for the glory of God.
Together they are to multiply and be stewards of the children God will give
them. And together they are to subdue the earth by a division of labour that
assigns to the man the primary responsibility to provide for his wife and
children, and to the woman the care for and nurture of her family.
2. The man is created first and is given
ultimate responsibility for the marriage relationship, while the woman is
placed alongside the man as his “suitable helper”.
Not
only does Paul draw attention to the fact that the man was created first, but
he also points out that it is not the man who was made for the woman, but the
woman for the man (1 Cor. 11:9; see Gen. 2:18, 20) and from the man (1 Cor.
11:8, 12; see Gen. 2:22).
The
man was the one who received the divine command (Gen. 2:16–17), was presented
with the woman (Gen. 2:22), and named the woman with a name derived from his
own (Gen. 2:23; see 3:20), which also implies his authority. God’s creation of
Eve demonstrates that his plan for Adam’s marriage, and all subsequent
marriages, involves a monogamous heterosexual relationship. God only made one
helper for Adam, and she was female. What is more, it was God who perceived
Adam’s aloneness and created the woman. It is only when men and women embrace
the God-ordained roles that they will be truly fulfilled and God’s creational
wisdom will be fully displayed and exalted
3. The fall of humanity entails negative
consequences for both the man and the woman. The fall witnesses a complete
reversal of the roles God assigns to the man and the woman. Rather than God’s
being in charge, with the man, helped by the woman, ruling creation for him,
Satan, in the form of a serpent, approaches the woman, who draws the man with
her into rebellion against the Creator. the couple is expelled from the garden
(Gen. 3:24) as a sign that their rebellion against the Creator had met with
severe sanctions that would cast an ominous shadow on their marriage during
their sojourn on earth from that time onward.
Can a
Christian marry more than one wife?
While it
certainly was within the Creator’s prerogative and power to make more than one
wife for the man, God intentionally made only Eve, revealing to Adam his plan
with the words, “A man [singular] shall leave his father and his mother and
hold fast to his wife [singular], and they shall become one flesh” (Gen. 2:24).
The sin and disorder produced by polygamy, then, is further testimony to the
goodness of God’s monogamous design of marriage as first revealed in the
marriage of Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden.
Is
Marriage Permanent or Divorce permissible?
Another
component of God’s design for marriage that Old Testament Israel regularly
compromised is the durability of marriage. The opening chapters of Genesis make
clear that God designed marriage to be permanent. This is evident in the
paradigmatic description of marriage in Genesis 2:24: “A man shall leave his
father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one
flesh.” God does not approve of divorce, for the Old Testament on several
occasions uses the analogy of divorce to describe Israel’s spiritual apostasy
(see Isa. 50:1; Jer. 3:8), and the prophet Malachi makes clear that God does
not approve of divorce motivated by hatred (Mal. 2:16).
Jesus denies
that you can divorce for any reason. By quoting Genesis 2:24, he confirms that
marriage is a covenant. It is not a casual relationship that can be discarded
easily. It creates a strong new unity that may only be broken under very
serious conditions. But he goes on to say that these serious conditions do
exist, because of “the hardness of your hearts.” That means that sometimes
human hearts become so hard because of sin that it leads a spouse into a severe
violation of the covenant, without prospects of repentance and healing, and in
such cases, divorce is permitted. The only such violation that Jesus names in
this passage is adultery. In 1 Corinthians 7, Paul adds another ground—namely,
wilful desertion. These actions essentially break the covenant vow so
thoroughly, that, as Paul says in 1 Corinthians 7:15, the wronged spouse “is
not bound.”
To allow
divorce for almost any reason is to hollow out the very concept of covenant and
vow. Divorce should not be easy; it should not be our first, second, third, or
fourth resort.
What
about Adultery?
While it
could be argued that fidelity was Adam’s only option, his lack of an
opportunity to commit adultery does not diminish the fact that fidelity is an
inherent component of God’s pattern for marriage: “A man shall leave his father
and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh”
(Gen. 2:24). Another way in which God’s ideal for marriage was compromised in
the history of Israel was by way of adultery. As with the principle of
monogamy, however, after the fall of humankind, the Old Testament reports that
numerous individuals struggled to be faithful to their marriage partners. The
sexual laws in the Holiness Code stipulated, “You shall not lie sexually with
your neighbour’s wife” (Lev. 18:20), setting the penalty for adultery as death
(Lev. 20:10; see Num. 5:11–31; Deut. 22:22). Moreover, the book of Proverbs
repeatedly classifies adultery as both foolish and dangerous (Prov. 2:16-19;
5:3–22; 6:32–33; 7:5–23; 9:13–18; 22:14; 23:27–28; 30:20).
Is
Homosexuality/Same-Sex Marriage a Sin?
Well, that
wasn’t on anyone’s radar in the ’80s and early ’90s. Even most gay activists
considered it either out of reach or a bad idea. In fact, in just the last
15-20 years we’ve seen big changes in how we think of gender, sexuality and
marriage.
Heterosexuality
is an unequivocal component of the Creator’s design for marriage. Yet after the
fall of humanity, the Old Testament indicates that the principle of
heterosexuality was often violated through same-sex relations. Examples include
many of the inhabitants of the cities of the plain, Sodom and Gomorrah (Gen.
19:1–29), the Gibeonites in the days of the judges (Judg. 19:1–21:25), as well
as numerous other unnamed lawbreakers in the history of Israel (1 Kings 14:24;
15:12; 22:46; 2 Kings 23:7; Job 36:14). Despite these offences, however, the
Old Testament makes clear that the principle of heterosexuality, established at
creation, continues to be an integral part of God’s design for marriage. This
is testified to by the severity of the punishment prescribed for
homosexuality—death (Lev. 20:13)—by the presentation of heterosexuality as
normative (Prov. 5:18–19; Eccl. 9:9; Song 1–8) and by the fate of individuals
in the history of Israel who engaged in homosexual activity.
A Few
definite reasons why the Church vehemently opposes Homosexuality/ Same-Sex
Marriage.
1. God opposes homosexuality. - Putting
homosexuality in the larger context, the Bible condemns all sexual
relationships outside of marriage. God’s idea is one man and one woman for
life, as stated in Genesis 2:24. Jesus did indeed condemn porneia, from which
our modern word pornography is derived. This word is translated as “sexual
immorality” in some of our English translations. It stands for a multitude of
sexual sins, all condemned in the Old Testament Law: premarital sex, adultery,
homosexuality, incest, and bestiality. Furthermore, Jesus put His seal of
approval on the Old Testament as God’s Word (Matt. 5:17-19).
2. Same-sex marriage (and same-sex
conjugal relations) goes against the natural order. Male with male and female
with female just do not work physically. It does not fit. It goes against
nature, and it creates all kinds of problems. As one wag put it, “God made Adam
and Eve—He didn’t make Adam and Steve.” Here are a few of the references on
homosexuality in the Scriptures. In Leviticus 20:13 we read: If a man lies with
a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall
surely be put to death; their blood is upon them
3. We read in the New Testament, in
Romans 1:26-28, about the plunge of man into the depths of depravity. In 1
Corinthians 6:9-10 (NIV) we read: “Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually
immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual
offenders [nor others. . . will inherit the kingdom of God.” The Greek word
translated as “homosexual offenders” is arsenokoites, taken from two Greek
words: arsen, “male” and coitus, “copulation.” The term means exactly and
precisely “male intercourse.” It says nothing about attitude or lust at all. It
is the act that is condemned—and those that do it. It says they shall not
inherit the kingdom of God.
4. Neither adulterers nor fornicators
nor homosexuals have any inheritance in the kingdom of God. Do not be deceived,
though many today are deceived. Thankfully Paul goes on to say, “And such were
some of you . . .” (1 Cor. 6:11)
5. The biblical verdict on homosexuality
is consistent. From the Pentateuch to the book of Revelation, from Jesus to
Paul, from Romans to the Pastorals, Scripture with one voice affirms that
homosexuality is a sin and a moral offence to God. The contemporary church
corporately, and biblical Christians individually, must bear witness to the
unanimous testimony of Scripture unequivocally and fearlessly.
Can we
justify Cohabitation/Live-in Relationships/ Living together?
Although
some people will say that a cohabiting couple (living together) is “married in
the eyes of God,” that is not true. They are not married in God’s eyes because
they are living contrary to biblical statements about marriage. And they are
not married in their own eyes because they have specifically decided not to
marry.
The increase
of cyber relations has increased duplicity and shallowness in inter-personal
relations. There is an increasing trend among the youth to look down on social
institutions like marriage and opt for informal live-in relationships. They
fail to see the benefits, which marriage as a social institution could bring to
their lives. For Christians, marriage is not a mere contract between two
individuals but a sacrament. Thus, it involves a deeper commitment on the part
of the husband and wife.
In our
fast-evolving globalized world, cultural exchanges have become common, leading
to the adoption of customs and systems from one region by people in other
regions, even within their own countries. Particularly, Western culture has
notably influenced social norms in our society. Young individuals are
increasingly moving away from traditional family customs, with the prevalence
of live-in relationships rising as they gradually, albeit not entirely, replace
the institution of marriage.
When asked,
a youth told me that one of the many reasons behind couples choosing
cohabitation over marriage is to assess compatibility and evaluate their
ability to handle the responsibilities that come with marriage. This period
allows them to determine if they can effectively live together and manage
shared commitments.
God designed
sexual intimacy to occur exclusively within the sacred commitment of marriage
(Genesis 2:21-24). When we trust God’s design, we can honour marriage as we are
commanded in Hebrews 13:4. The Bible teaches that the act of sexual intercourse
can have a strong bonding effect on two people. When done within the bounds of
marriage, the man and the woman become one flesh. Ephesians 5:31 says: “For
this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto
his wife, and they two shall be one flesh.” Sexual intercourse outside of
marriage also has consequences.
Writing to
the church in Corinth, Paul said that when a man joins himself to a prostitute,
he becomes one body with her (1 Corinthians 6:16). The context of the
discussion arose from a problem within the church. A man in the church was
having sexual relations with his father’s wife (1 Corinthians 5:1-3). Paul
calls this relationship sinful. In 1 Corinthians 6:18, he says we are to flee
sexual immorality. Sexual immorality is condemned in about 25 passages in the
New Testament.
Jesus taught
in Mark 7:21-23: “For from within, out of men’s hearts, come evil thoughts,
sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness,
envy, slander, arrogance, and folly. All these evils come from inside and make
a man unclean.” In the New Testament, believers are warned against persistent
sin, including sexual sin (1 Corinthians 5:1-5). The church is to keep
believers accountable for their behaviour.
Believers
are to judge themselves, lest they fall into God’s hands (1 Corinthians
11:31-32). Living together outside of marriage not only violates biblical
commands but it puts a couple and their future marriage at risk. If you want a
good marriage, don’t do what society says. Do what the Bible teaches us to do.
There is
also a naked fact that the number of believers gathering for worship and
regular fellowship is reducing in the Western world. Moreover, parents who do
not practice their faith, fail to teach their children the importance of faith.
Very often children who grow up in families, without any Christian education
abandon their faith. This leads to a steady rise of youngsters who have no
connection with their local parishes. Thus, parents need to practice their
faith in their homes. They need to teach their children the importance of
living the gospel values.
Comments